Alexandre Genko-Starosselsky joins EQA
We are delighted to announce the arrival of Alexandre Genko-Starosselsky as a new partner in our firm.
Alexandre Genko-Starosselsky has been a member of the Paris Bar since June 2000, and holds a DEA in international private law from Paris I. He specializes in international litigation. He defends leading businessmen and companies before the European Court of Justice and other courts in member countries. His cross-disciplinary experience in different areas of the law enables him to offer innovative and tailored solutions for his clients, whether in business criminal law, commercial litigation or arbitration. As an experienced speaker who is committed to perfect knowledge of the files and applicable law, he is entrusted with highly complex cases, often combining different legal systems.
His expertise and leadership will bolster our team, enhancing our ability to meet the needs of our clients !
Latest news
EU General Court Rules for the First Time on Damages Claims After the Annulment of Sanctions
The General Court of the European Union (EU) recently delivered a judgment in a case concerning the non-contractual liability of the Union (GC, Pumpyanskiy v Council, T-369/24), brought by a citizen holding Russian and Swiss nationality following the adoption of restrictive measures against him—the individual concerned being listed in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No… Continue reading EU General Court Rules for the First Time on Damages Claims After the Annulment of Sanctions
A Judicial Storm Looms: How the Central Bank Can Challenge the Confiscation of Reserves in the EU
In one week, European Union leaders could approve proposals by the European Commission to “pledge as collateral” Russia’s immobilized sovereign reserves for a “reparations loan” to Ukraine. The vast majority of the Russian Central Bank’s (RCB) assets are located in Belgium (Euroclear), whose Prime Minister has repeatedly warned that transferring these assets for Ukraine’s benefit… Continue reading A Judicial Storm Looms: How the Central Bank Can Challenge the Confiscation of Reserves in the EU
Harmonisation and Clarification of the EU Sanctions Regime: Insertion of the Concepts of “Ownership” and “Control”
Pursuant to Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, natural or legal persons designated in Annex I to that Regulation are subject to the freezing of all funds and economic resources belonging to them. It is also… Continue reading Harmonisation and Clarification of the EU Sanctions Regime: Insertion of the Concepts of “Ownership” and “Control”
Political communication on tax matters, first lesson: Present as exceptional what is meant to become structural.
Nearly fifteen years ago, the 2012 Finance Act introduced an apparently temporary tax, the Exceptional Contribution on High Incomes (CEHR), conceived “in a context of reducing public deficits and restoring our public finances,” intended “to request an exceptional effort from the wealthiest taxpayers.”¹

